15 Jun 2026

North Carolina lawmakers have reached a tentative agreement to raise the sports betting tax rate on operators, which currently stands at 18 percent of gross wagering revenue, and this adjustment forms part of broader 2026 budget negotiations designed to generate extra revenue for hospitals, housing projects, and data centers. The discussions center on a possible new rate between 20 and 30 percent, while the state has already collected over $287 million in taxes since online sports betting launched in March 2024, with total wagers exceeding $15.3 billion during that period.
The move comes as budget talks intensify ahead of the June 2026 legislative session, where officials seek ways to fund key state priorities without new broad-based taxes. Lawmakers have examined the sports betting sector closely because of its rapid growth since legalization, and they see the tax adjustment as one tool to balance the upcoming fiscal plan. According to figures released during negotiations, the existing 18 percent rate has produced steady collections that exceed initial projections, yet rising demands in healthcare and infrastructure have prompted calls for a higher contribution from the industry.
Under the framework established when online sports betting began in March 2024, operators pay 18 percent of their gross wagering revenue directly to the state, and this structure has delivered consistent returns that now surpass $287 million. Total wagers placed through legal platforms have topped $15.3 billion, which demonstrates strong consumer participation across the state. Budget analysts have reviewed these numbers during closed-door meetings and noted that even a modest increase could add tens of millions of dollars annually to state coffers without requiring changes to other revenue streams.
Negotiators have floated rates in the 20 to 30 percent range as part of a compromise package that also addresses unrelated spending areas such as hospital expansions and affordable housing initiatives. Data centers, which require significant infrastructure investment, have also been listed among the priorities that could benefit from the additional funds. The talks remain fluid, yet the tentative agreement signals that both legislative chambers have found common ground on using the sports betting tax as a targeted revenue measure.

The Sports Betting Alliance has voiced opposition to the proposed hike and warned that higher taxes could push bettors toward illegal markets operating outside state oversight. Alliance representatives have pointed to experiences in other states where sharp tax increases coincided with measurable shifts in activity to unregulated platforms, and they argue that such an outcome would reduce the very tax collections the budget plan seeks to expand. Lawmakers have acknowledged these concerns during committee hearings, though they continue to weigh the revenue needs against potential market effects.
Operators licensed in North Carolina have maintained compliance with the current 18 percent rate while expanding their product offerings and marketing efforts, and industry data shows consistent month-over-month growth in handle since launch. The alliance has urged policymakers to consider alternatives such as volume-based incentives or phased increases that might limit migration to illegal channels, yet the tentative agreement appears to prioritize immediate revenue targets over those suggestions.
The 2026 budget negotiations encompass multiple funding areas, and sports betting tax revenue has emerged as one component that can help close projected gaps without raising income or sales taxes. Hospital systems across the state have lobbied for increased support to cover rising operational costs, while housing programs aim to address shortages in both urban and rural counties. Data center projects, which promise job creation and long-term economic development, require upfront infrastructure spending that the additional gambling taxes could help finance.
State budget documents indicate that the current collections already flow into the general fund, and any increase would follow the same path unless lawmakers designate specific uses during final budget drafting. Discussions continue on whether a portion of the new revenue should be earmarked for problem gambling programs or regulatory enforcement, though no firm decisions have been announced. The June 2026 timeline gives negotiators several weeks to refine the package before a full legislative vote.
Following the tentative agreement, legislative staff have begun drafting language that would amend the existing sports betting tax statute and integrate the change into the larger budget bill. Committee chairs expect public hearings in the coming weeks, where operators, alliance representatives, and revenue officials can provide additional input. Final approval remains contingent on broader budget compromises involving education funding and transportation projects, which means the tax rate adjustment could shift before the bill reaches the governor's desk.
Observers note that similar tax adjustments in other jurisdictions have required follow-up legislation to address unintended consequences, and North Carolina lawmakers have signaled they will monitor market data after implementation. The state revenue department has already established tracking systems that capture operator reports on a monthly basis, which would allow quick assessment of any behavioral changes among bettors.
The tentative agreement marks a pivotal moment in North Carolina's approach to sports betting regulation and revenue policy as the 2026 budget cycle advances. With more than $15.3 billion in wagers already placed and over $287 million collected under the current 18 percent rate, lawmakers view the sector as a reliable funding source for hospitals, housing, and data centers. The proposed increase to a rate between 20 and 30 percent has drawn direct opposition from the Sports Betting Alliance, which highlights risks of growth in illegal markets. As negotiations continue toward a June 2026 deadline, the final tax structure will depend on how lawmakers balance revenue goals against industry warnings. Further updates will emerge as the budget bill moves through committees and public review. For additional details on the agreement, see the WRAL coverage of the legislative discussions.